main_banner.gif

Australian New Crops Web Site
Supported by the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation

The farming system exercise

New crops worthy of research and development have been identified in the past by several approaches.  We should be aware of these, because they are not necessarily useful now. 

 

The three most obvious methods have been the political method, the expert method and the serendipity method, often associated with recreational research.

 

1.  The political process

 

Every revolutionary idea - in science, politics, art, or whatever - evokes three stages of reaction in a hearer:

--It is completely impossible - don't waste my time.

--It is possible, but it is not worth doing.

--I said it was a good idea all along.

 

The political process produces new crop development programs to satisfy a political will.  This can be the result of a particular agricultural policy, specific agricultural funding or may be due to pressure exerted by lobby groups.  Such processes have been successful in the past in drawing attention to potential new crop industries.  Unfortunately, relatively short political time spans contrast with the long lead times required to commercialise new crops.

 

2.  The expert process

 

An expert in any field is a person who knows enough about what's really going on to be scared.

 (P.J. Plauger)

 

An expert in a new crop is often not as effectively equipped with information about the crop as crop experts working with established crops.  The learning process needs to be a shared experience between the industry and the so-called expert. 

 

3.  Serendipity

 

Serendipity -The pleasant surprise of happening upon a fortunate discovery when you weren't in search of it. 

Henry Walpole in The Princess of Serendip (Ceylon, 1754)

 

Serendipity is the discovery of interesting new crops unexpectedly or by accident.  Serendipity has played a large role in the development of new crops, often as a result of the recreational interests of inquiring people.  Such research receives little or no direct funding but is often carried out by recognised researchers, as well as by gifted amateurs, in their own backyards.  Much useful observation has been done by members of semi-professional organisations.

 

An alternative approach has been to propose a systems or holistic approach, whereby the commercialisation of the crop commences and the process is closely monitored.  Such a process is described in the thirteen steps of commercialisation.

 

4.  The systems approach

 

Whenever a system becomes completely defined, someone discovers something which either abolishes the system or expands it beyond recognition. 

(Brooke's Law)

 

A system is a group of interrelated entities that receives input which affects it in some way and produces output to achieve needed purposes. 

A system is like an iceberg:  90% of it is not visible.

 

To gain some insight into our current farming systems, with a view to commencing new crop commercialisation, a systems exercise is used for DOOR Marketing participants.  They work through the questions and thereby characterise the factors which comprise their farming system. 

 

The aim of this exercise is to demonstrate the complexity of the interactions already in place in a farming system and the difficulties in predicting how a new crop will affect the current system.  The first section encourages holistic thinking without being specific about many of the details; the second section invites some specific details, in the context of the interacting system; the third section tests how difficult it may be to alter any specific detail and the fourth section invites some specific plans.

 

 

1.1  What are our wishes or dreams?

 

 

 

1.2  How much do we really know about the dream?

 

 

How much do we really know?

How fanciful is the dream?

How good is the information we have?

Where are we now?

Where do we want to be in ten years?

 

 

1.3  What is the main purpose?

 

 

How do we make the dream come true?

 

1.4  What is the environment like, physical and otherwise?

 

 

Can we take a broad view of our own capabilities?

 

 

1.5  Who would we like to have interested?

 

Who do we need to help us make the dream come true?

 

 

1.6  What inputs would we like to have available, including people, finance, information?

 

What contributions are likely from others?

Is a cooperative feasible?

 

 

1.7  What equipment would we like to have available?

 

 

Do we have access to all the equipment needed?

 

 

1.8  What outcomes would we like to see and when?

 

 

Can we define the product accurately?

What would we wish the market to be?

 

 

 

 

2.1  What are our specific objectives?

 

What is to be done?

How is it to be done?

Where is it to be done?

Who will do it?

 

 

2.2  What are our aims?

 

 

What is the main purpose, what is the purpose of the purpose etc.

 

 

2.3  How much do we know about achieving the purpose?

 

 

What is the key information?

What do we need to know?

Do we have the information we need?

How good is the information we have?

 

 

2.4  What is the most likely way to achieve the main purpose?

 

 

Have you considered the ten points of planning?

 

2.5  What parts of the environment do we need to have access to, in order to achieve the purpose?

 

 

Take a specific view of your capabilities, based on the reality of having to achieve the purpose.

What are the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats?

 

 

2.6  Who is available and is willing to participate?

 

 

Form the team.

How clever are the people available?

Who is missing?

 

 

2.7  What are the inputs available, including people, finance, information?

 

 

What are the available assets?

 

 

2.8  How much of the needed equipment is available?

 

 

Describe the value-added chain from production to sale

 

2.9  What are the likely outcomes

 

 

Conduct pre-feasibility marketing analysis

 

 

 

 

3.1  How can the system be evaluated and modified?

 

 

 

3.2  Do the aims need reassessment?

 

 

What is the solution-after-next?

 

3.3  What research information needs to be commissioned?

 

 

 

3.4  What is the most likely way to carry out the main purpose?

 

 

 

3.5  What is the environment like, physical and otherwise?

 

 

 

3.6  How clever are the people available?

 

 

Evaluate the outcomes

 

3.7  What are the inputs available, including people, finance, information?

 

 

Analyse costs

 

3.8  How much of the needed equipment is available?

 

 

 

3.9  What are the likely outcomes

 

 

Gross margins

Profit

Return on investment

 

 

 

 

4.1  What are our aims/future plans?

 

 

 

4.2  How good is the information?

 

 

 

4.3  What is the most likely way to carry out the main purpose?

 

 

 

4.4  What is the environment like, physical and otherwise?

 

 

 

4.5  How clever are the people available?

 

 

 

4.6  What are the inputs available, including people, finance, information?

 

 

 

4.7  How much of the needed equipment is available?

 

 

 

4.8  What are the likely outcomes

 

 

 

Once systems thinking has been practised, a brainstorming exercise follows to consider what information will be needed for the commercialisation of a new crop.

 


Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (RIRDC) Home Page

RIRDC New Plant Products
Home Page

RIRDC New Plant Products
Research Reports

RIRDC New Rural Industries
Handbook Contents


All information is included in good faith but this website does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of any information on these pages, nor does the website accept responsibility for any loss arising from the use of this information.  Views and opinions are those of the authors themselves.  Every effort has been made to respect copyright owners' rights. 


Contact: Webmaster, Australian New Crops Website
australiannewcrops@gmail.com

Latest update 30 August 2009 by: ANCW